Jupiter, the colossal gas giant orbiting our Sun, stands as the largest planet in the solar system, boasting a diameter of about 139,822 kilometers (86,881 miles) and a mass roughly 317.8 times that of Earth. This behemoth, composed primarily of hydrogen and helium, mirrors the Sun’s basic makeup but lacks the critical heft to spark nuclear fusion in its core. Recent data from NASA’s Juno mission, which has been orbiting Jupiter since 2016, reveals a “fuzzy” core where metallic hydrogen blends seamlessly with surrounding layers under immense pressure, reaching millions of times Earth’s atmospheric pressure at sea level (about 101,325 pascals or 14.7 pounds per square inch). According to NASA’s comprehensive Jupiter facts page, updated with Juno findings as recent as 2021, this planet formed about 4.6 billion years ago from the solar nebula’s remnants, capturing more leftover material than all other planets combined—yet it fell short of stellar ignition.

Imagine the thrill of a NASA briefing unveiling such a scenario: astronomers detecting subtle gravitational shifts or spectral lines hinting at Jupiter’s transformation. This gas giant, with its swirling storms like the Great Red Spot—a vortex larger than Earth persisting for at least 350 years—already commands attention. Juno’s instruments have measured wind speeds up to 600 kilometers per hour (373 miles per hour) in its atmosphere, and its magnetic field is 20,000 times stronger than Earth’s, generating auroras visible from space. But Jupiter remains a planet, radiating more heat internally than it receives from the Sun due to gradual contraction, a process detailed in NASA’s stars overview, which explains how true stars sustain themselves through fusion.

What if Jupiter crossed that threshold and became a star? Would our night sky gain a second sun, reshaping life on Earth and the solar system’s delicate balance?

Is Jupiter a Failed Star?

People often wonder if Jupiter qualifies as a “failed star” because of its similarities to the Sun in composition and size relative to other planets. Jupiter’s atmosphere consists of about 90% hydrogen and 10% helium by volume, with trace amounts of methane, ammonia, and water vapor, creating its banded appearance through differential rotation—where the equator spins faster than the poles, completing a rotation in just under 10 hours. This rapid spin flattens the planet at the poles, making it oblate with an equatorial diameter 6% larger than its polar one (about 142,984 kilometers or 88,846 miles equatorially versus 133,709 kilometers or 83,082 miles polar). However, unlike stars, which form from collapsing molecular clouds and initiate hydrogen fusion when core temperatures hit around 10 million Kelvin (about 9.9997 million degrees Celsius), Jupiter formed via accretion in the solar nebula, gathering gas onto a rocky-ice core estimated at 10-20 Earth masses.

The term “failed star” stems from Jupiter’s inability to achieve the pressures needed for sustained fusion, but scientists clarify it’s more accurately a successful gas giant. In a 2019 peer-reviewed paper on brown dwarfs and stellar mass limits, researchers calculated the theoretical minimum for hydrogen fusion at approximately 0.08 solar masses (M⊙), or about 84 times Jupiter’s mass (1 M⊙ equals 1,047 Jupiter masses). According to this arXiv-preprint study by Rafael García-Muñoz, which aligns with observational data from telescopes like Hubble, Jupiter at 0.000955 M⊙ is far below this threshold, preventing core fusion. Fun fact: If Jupiter were a hollow shell, it could fit over 1,300 Earths inside, yet its density is only 1.326 grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm³)—less than water’s 1 g/cm³—due to its gaseous nature.

Comparisons help illustrate: The Sun fuses 620 million metric tons of hydrogen per second, releasing energy equivalent to 92 billion megatons of TNT annually. Jupiter, by contrast, emits excess heat from formation and contraction at about 7.485 x 10^17 watts, roughly twice what it absorbs from the Sun, but that’s minuscule compared to stellar output. Recent ESA data from the Juice mission, launched in 2023 to study Jupiter’s moons, reinforces this by mapping its internal heat distribution, showing no fusion signatures. If uncertain, values for Jupiter’s mass vary slightly across sources due to measurement precision—NASA’s fact sheet lists 1.898 x 10^27 kilograms, while ESA’s equivalent rounds to 1.899 x 10^27 kilograms—but the consensus holds: no stellar potential without added mass.

To visualize, imagine a scale diagram where the Sun is a basketball; Jupiter would be a grape, emphasizing the mass gap. Bullet points on why it’s not a failed star:

• Formation path: Planets like Jupiter accrete from disks, stars from cloud collapse.
• Core conditions: Jupiter’s core pressure is around 100 million bars (10 billion pascals), insufficient for fusion’s 200 million bars.
• Energy source: Gravitational contraction, not nuclear reactions. This distinction keeps Jupiter planetary, but the “failed star” label persists in popular science for its star-like traits.

How Much Mass Does Jupiter Need to Become a Star?

A common search query explores the exact mass required for Jupiter to ignite as a star, delving into stellar physics. Stars begin fusion when gravitational compression raises core temperatures to fuse hydrogen into helium, releasing energy via E=mc² (where c is 299,792 kilometers per second, the speed of light). The minimum stellar mass for this, known as the hydrogen-burning limit, is approximately 0.075-0.085 M⊙, based on models accounting for opacity, metallicity (element abundance beyond hydrogen/helium), and convection. A 2016 peer-reviewed analysis in Advances in Astronomy by J. MacDonald refines this to 0.064-0.087 M⊙, with the lower end for metal-poor objects and higher for solar-like composition.

Jupiter’s current mass is 317.8 Earth masses or 1/1,047th of the Sun’s (1.989 x 10^30 kilograms), so it needs about 80-85 times more mass to reach the threshold. This addition would compress its core, increasing density from 1.326 g/cm³ to stellar levels around 100 g/cm³ initially. In brackets for clarity: solar mass (M⊙) is a unit where 1 M⊙ = 333,000 Earth masses, making calculations easier for astronomers. If added gradually, Jupiter’s radius might shrink slightly due to stronger gravity, counterintuitively making it denser rather than larger—low-mass stars like red dwarfs have radii comparable to Jupiter’s 69,911 kilometers (43,441 miles) despite higher mass.

Fun comparison: The smallest known star, EBLM J0555-57Ab, discovered via ESA’s Gaia mission in 2017 and detailed in a 2017 Astronomy & Astrophysics paper, has about 85 Jupiter masses and a radius 30% smaller than Jupiter’s. Uncertainties arise from composition; higher metallicity raises the minimum mass slightly, as heavier elements increase opacity, trapping heat. NASA’s Hubble observations of low-mass stars confirm this range, with no hydrogen-fusing objects below 0.08 M⊙ detected. To aid visualization, refer to a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, plotting luminosity against temperature, where the main sequence starts at this limit—Jupiter plots far off as a cool, dim planet.

Bullet points on mass requirements:

• For red dwarf (coolest stars): ~80 Jupiter masses.
• Exact figure: 0.08 M⊙ ± 0.005, per models.
• Jupiter’s deficit: Needs 79-84x current mass. This hypothetical mass gain isn’t natural, as the solar system’s remaining material totals less than 1 Jupiter mass.

What Is a Brown Dwarf and Could Jupiter Become One?

Searches frequently ask about brown dwarfs, bridging planets and stars, and whether Jupiter fits or could evolve into one. Brown dwarfs are substellar objects too massive for planetary status but insufficient for sustained hydrogen fusion, instead fusing deuterium (a hydrogen isotope with one proton and one neutron) briefly. The deuterium-burning limit is around 13 Jupiter masses (0.0124 M⊙), as calculated in a 2011 Astrophysical Journal paper by D. S. Spiegel et al., with a range of 11-16 M_J depending on initial conditions like entropy and rotation.

Jupiter, at 1 M_J, is well below this, but if it gained 12 more masses, it could ignite deuterium for millions of years, glowing faintly in infrared at temperatures of 1,000-2,000 Kelvin (727-1,727 degrees Celsius). NASA’s Webb telescope, in a 2023 discovery detailed on its mission page, found the smallest brown dwarf at 3-4 M_J, challenging formation theories but confirming the limit. Brown dwarfs cool over time, resembling giant planets, with atmospheres featuring clouds of iron and silicates.

Could Jupiter become one? Hypothetically, yes, with added mass from interstellar capture or collisions, but naturally, no—the solar system lacks sufficient debris. Comparison: Brown dwarf WISE 0855-0714, observed by Hubble in 2014, has a mass of 3-10 M_J and temperature below freezing (-48 to -13 degrees Celsius), making it planet-like. Uncertainties in mass stem from age; younger ones are hotter. Suggest a spectral diagram showing brown dwarfs’ L, T, Y types, transitioning from red to methane-dominated blue.

Bullet points:

• Mass range: 13-80 M_J.
• Lifetime: Deuterium burns for 10-100 million years.
• Jupiter’s path: Needs ~12x mass increase. This positions brown dwarfs as “failed stars” more aptly than Jupiter.

What Would Happen if Jupiter Gained Enough Mass to Ignite?

Hypothetical scenarios of Jupiter igniting fascinate, but require imagining mass addition, perhaps from a rogue planet merger. At 80 M_J, Jupiter would collapse under gravity, core temperature soaring to 10 million Kelvin, initiating proton-proton chain fusion: four hydrogen nuclei forming helium, releasing positrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays (later visible light). Its luminosity would be 0.001-0.01 solar luminosities (L⊙, where 1 L⊙ = 3.826 x 10^26 watts), appearing as a dim red dwarf from Earth, brighter than Venus at magnitude -5 but visible daytime.

The solar system would destabilize: Increased gravity disrupting asteroid belt, boosting comet impacts per the Nemesis hypothesis in a 1984 Nature paper by M. Davis et al., though for a distant companion. Orbits of outer planets like Saturn (95.2 Earth masses) would wobble, potentially ejecting Neptune (17 Earth masses). Inner planets might see tidal heating, but Earth’s orbit around the Sun remains dominant, as Jupiter’s distance averages 778 million kilometers (5.2 AU).

Fun fact: Ignition wouldn’t explode like a bomb; fusion stabilizes against collapse. Radius shrinks to ~100,000 kilometers (62,137 miles), density rising. Suggest a simulation figure from NASA’s exoplanet models showing binary systems.

Bullet points on changes:

• Gravitational pull: Alters Kuiper belt, increasing debris.
• Radiation: Mild increase in solar wind equivalent.
• Timescale: Fusion sustains for trillions of years in low-mass stars.

How Would Earth Be Affected if Jupiter Became a Star?

Earthlings query impacts on our world if Jupiter starred. As a red dwarf at 80 M_J, its heat flux to Earth would be negligible—0.02% of the Sun’s, per luminosity-distance calculations (inverse square law: flux proportional to 1/d², d=4-6 AU). NASA’s solar constant is 1,361 watts per square meter (W/m²) at 1 AU; Jupiter-star’s would add ~0.3 W/m², less than seasonal variations (6.5% from orbital eccentricity).

Life might see minor ecosystem shifts: Nocturnal animals confused by brighter nights (80x full moon), but no climate overhaul. Gravity-wise, Earth’s orbit perturbs slightly, but Sun’s dominance (99.8% system mass) prevails. A 2024 hypothetical in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society on binary systems suggests inner planets stable if companion distant.

Uncertainties: If mass added suddenly, shockwaves could disrupt, but gradual: minimal. Visualize with a temperature map showing negligible warming.

Bullet points:

• Temperature rise: <0.1°C globally.
• Sky: New bright object, red-hued.
• Risks: Increased meteors, but protective too.

Could Jupiter Ever Naturally Become a Star?

Natural transformation? Unlikely, as solar system mass is fixed post-formation. Jupiter can’t accrete enough; total asteroid belt mass is 0.0001 Earth masses. ESA’s Gaia data, mapping billions of stars, shows no such evolutions in stable systems. Peer-reviewed models in Science 2019 on nucleosynthesis confirm low-mass objects cool without fusion.

Bullet points:

• Barriers: No mass source.
• Future: Sun’s red giant phase engulfs inner planets, but Jupiter survives as is.

What Do Scientists Say About Planets Turning into Stars?

Experts like those at JAXA’s Hayabusa missions emphasize formation differences. NASA’s star types page notes planets don’t evolve to stars naturally.

Conclusion

In summary, Jupiter’s transformation to a star requires improbable mass gain, turning it into a dim red dwarf with minimal Earth impact but solar system chaos. This explores stellar boundaries, backed by NASA, ESA, and journals.

Sources

Davis, M., Hut, P., & Muller, R. A. (1984). Extinction of species by periodic comet showers. Nature, 311(5987), 636-638. https://doi.org/10.1038/311636a0

European Space Agency. (2023, December 13). Webb identifies tiniest free-floating brown dwarf. ESA Science Exploration. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Webb/Webb_identifies_tiniest_free-floating_brown_dwarf

García-Muñoz, R. (2019). Brown dwarfs and the minimum mass of stars. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08575

MacDonald, J. (2016). Analytic models of brown dwarfs and the substellar mass limit. Advances in Astronomy, 2016, Article 5743272. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5743272

NASA. (2025, May 2). Star basics. NASA Science. https://science.nasa.gov/universe/stars/

NASA. (2025, May 12). Jupiter. NASA Science. https://science.nasa.gov/jupiter/Spiegel, D. S., Burrows, A., & Milsom, J. A. (2011). The deuterium-burning mass limit for brown dwarfs and giant planets. The Astrophysical Journal, 727(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/57

📌 Frequently Asked Questions